Your manuscript should really be a priority for book in Tobacco Control

Your manuscript should really be a priority for book in Tobacco Control

  • In the event that movie shows any recognizable living patients and/or recognizable personal stats, writers need certainly to demonstrate that consent happens to be acquired. In case a consent that is patient ended up being given to the associated article, you don’t have to give this once again for the video clip.
  • Please utilize the compression parameters that movie sharing web sites utilize. Frequently they are standard choices from your own modifying pc computer software. an extensive guide is available from the vimeo web site.

Videos are too big to e-mail therefore will have to be uploaded to BMJ’s account regarding the Hightail web site. Please range from the journal’s name along with your manuscript ID number in the message field – this will allow us to fit your movie to your paper. Your movie has to be gotten by the right time which you get back the modifications for the article evidence, at the really latest. Please be aware that in the event that you try not to correctly label your movie or you skip the deadline, this might cause delays in book of both your article therefore the video.

All video clip abstracts will likely be examined for suitability because of the editorial publication and team just isn’t guaranteed in full. In a few instances editors may request edits to your video clip.

Movie abstracts are embedded in the research article on the internet and additionally posted individually in the journal’s YouTube channel. They have been published underneath the same copyright terms while the associated article.

Article processing charges

During distribution, writers can select to own their article published access that is open GBP 1950 (plus VAT for British and EU writers). Writers may also decide to publish their article in color for the print version – rather than the standard option of black colored and that is white GBP 250. There are not any distribution, web page or colour that is online-only costs.

To learn more about available access, funder compliance and programmes that are institutional click the link.

Information sharing

Tobacco Control adheres to BMJ’s Tier 3 information policy. We highly encourage that data created by your quest that supports your article be manufactured available at the earliest opportunity, anywhere lawfully and ethically feasible. All research articles must include a Data Availability Statement. For lots more information and FAQs, please see BMJ’s Data Sharing Policy that is full web web page.

Tobacco Control mandates ORCID iDs for the author that is submitting enough time of article distribution; co-authors and reviewers are strongly motivated to additionally connect their ScholarOne records to ORCID. We highly think that the increased use and integration of ORCID iDs will undoubtedly be good for the research community that is whole.

Please find more info about ORCID and BMJ’s policy on our Author Hub .

Submission gu

Please review the under article kind specs such as the necessary article lengths, pictures, dining table restrictions and guide counts. The term count excludes the title web web page, abstract, tables, acknowledgements, contributions and recommendations. Manuscripts ought to be since succinct as you can.

For further help when creating your distribution please reference the resources available in the BMJ Author Hub. Right Here you’ll find informative data on writing and formatting your research until the review that is peer and promoting your paper. It’s also possible to need to make use of the language modifying and translation solutions given by BMJ Author Services.

When your article is accepted it is possible to make the most of BMJ’s partnership with Kudos , a totally free solution that will help you increase your article’s reach.

Analysis paper

Articles research that is reporting be full size or brief reports. Documents should generally be no more than 3500 words in length, excluding tables, sources, abstract and ‘What this paper adds’. Exceptions may periodically be manufactured for this, especially in the actual situation of review articles, qualitative research and tobacco industry document research, however in basic shorter documents could be more competitive for publication. The editors will think about the merits of this instance for extended documents for a basis that is case-by-case but documents much longer than 5000 terms will not be considered. Writers are strongly motivated to see or watch the suggested length restrictions, as extortionate size may disadvantage an otherwise appropriate paper because of the room restrictions associated with the log.

Writers ought to include a part entitled ‘What this paper adds’, which summarises the key communications from the investigation as follows:

      • What exactly is currently understood with this topic. In 2 or three sentence that is single points please summarise their state of clinical knowledge with this topic. Be clear and certain, perhaps perhaps not vague.
      • Exactly just exactly What gaps that are important knowledge exist on this subject.
      • Exactly just What this research adds. In a single or two sentence that is single points give a straightforward response to the concern ‘ What do we currently understand due to this research that people failed to understand before?’. Be brief, succinct, particular, and accurate.

      Term count: generally as much as 3500 terms
      Tables/Illustrations: as much as 5
      sources: no limitation, but be sure to use sources just as required
      this short article type is susceptible to interior and outside peer review

      Brief report

      Brief reports are reduced variations of initial articles, must not meet or exceed 1500 words, and may even include one dining table or figure.

      This informative article kind is susceptible to interior and peer review that is external.

      Letter research that is(original

      Research letters designed for publication must be at the most 500 terms, 10 sources, plus one table or figure. Those answering articles published within the log ought to be submitted as described below under communication.

      Research letters must not replicate information given within the text of a write-up. They need to have name, a short practices part, outcomes and a conversation.

      This short article kind is at the mercy of interior and peer review that is external.

      Unique interaction

      Unique communications are documents that don’t report initial research information but which supply a conversation, analysis, or report about a subject that is particular. As a whole these must be 3500 terms or less, with smaller efforts advantaged in consideration of area limits.

      This short article kind is at the mercy of internal and often outside peer review.

      Review article

      Review articles offer analysis the literary works, often concerning a certain topic, nation, or geographical area. Review manuscripts, including meta-analyses, ought to include an abstract with all the after headings: objective, data sources, research selection, information removal, data synthesis, and conclusions writers publishing review manuscripts and reports regarding the link between meta-analyses should prepare an abstract of a maximum of 250 words underneath the after headings:

          • Objective – The abstract must start having a statement that is precise of main objective associated with review. The main focus with this declaration should always be directed by or perhaps a review emphasises facets such as for example cause, behavior, intervention, populace, or avoidance. It should consist of information regarding the population that is specific intervention, visibility, and test or result that is being evaluated.
          • Information sources – A succinct summary of information sources must certanly be provided, including any moment limitations. Prospective sources include specialists or research institutions mixed up in field, computerised databases and posted indexes, registries, abstract booklets, meeting procedures, sources identified from bibliographies of relevant articles and books, and organizations or manufacturers of tests or agents being reviewed. If your bibliographic database is utilized, the actual indexing terms utilized for article retrieval ought to be stated, including any constraints (as an example, English language or peoples subjects).
          • Learn selection – The abstract should describe the requirements utilized to choose studies for detail by detail review from among studies recognized as strongly related this issue. Information on selection will include specific populations, interventions, results, or designs that are methodological. The technique used to apply these requirements should always be specified – as an example, blind review, opinion, numerous reviewers. The percentage of initially identified studies that came across selection requirements should always be stated.
          • Information removal – tips useful for abstracting data and data that are assessing and credibility (such as for example criteria for causal inference) ought to be described. The strategy in which the rules had been used ought to be stated: for instance, separate extraction by numerous observers.
          • Data synthesis – the primary outcomes of the review, whether qualitative or quantitative, must be stated. Practices utilized to acquire these total outcomes ought to be outlined. Meta-analyses should state the outcomes that are major had been pooled and can include odds ratios or effect sizes and when feasible, sensitiveness analyses. Numerical outcomes should really be followed by confidence periods, if relevant, and precise degrees of statistical significance. Evaluations of testing and diagnostic tests should address problems of sensitiveness, specificity, likelihood ratios, receiver running attribute curves, and predictive values. Assessments of prognosis ought to include summarisations of success characteristics and associated variables. Major identified sources of variation between studies is stated, including variations in therapy protocols, co-interventions, confounders, result measures, follow through, and dropout prices.
          • Conclusions – The conclusions and their applications ought to be demonstrably stated, restricting generalisation into the domain associated with the review. The necessity for brand brand new studies could be recommended.

          Term count: by settlement, but generally speaking 5000 terms or less (excluding tables, numbers and recommendations)
          this short article type is at the mercy of interior and peer review that is external.

Deixe uma resposta

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *